Jaringan Laboratorium Medis

Vol. 7 No. 1 (2025): May 2025
Original Articles

Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of the Mindray BC-5380 Hematology Analyzer in Predilute Mode Predilute Against Hemoglobin Examination in Capillary Blood

PDF
  • Dwi Apriliani,
  • Yayuk Mundriyastutik, S.T., M.T,
  • Arief Adi Saputro
Dwi Apriliani
Universitas Muhammadiyah Kudus
Yayuk Mundriyastutik, S.T., M.T
Universitas Muhammadiyah Kudus
Bio
Arief Adi Saputro
Universitas Muhammadiyah Kudus
Bio

Published 2025-05-01

Keywords

  • Accuracy,
  • Precision,
  • Haemoglobin,
  • Haematology Analyzer,
  • Predilute Mode

Copyright (c) 2025 Jaringan Laboratorium Medis

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

How to Cite

Evaluation of the Accuracy and Precision of the Mindray BC-5380 Hematology Analyzer in Predilute Mode Predilute Against Hemoglobin Examination in Capillary Blood. (2025). Jaringan Laboratorium Medis, 7(1), 20-26. https://doi.org/10.31983/jlm.v7i1.12778

CrossMark



Dimensions

If it doesn't Appear, click here



PlumX Metrics



Impact Factor

or, Visit on here

Abstract

echnological advances affect the automation of laboratory equipment, one of which is haemoglobin examination with a haematology analyzer that has several modes of examination to improve accuracy and precision. The haemoglobin test data at RSU Fastabiq Sehat PKU Muhammadiyah Pati reached 25,365 tests. Predilute mode on the Mindray BC-5380 haematology analyser is rarely used, only about 2%, very much different from the use of Whole Blood (WB) mode which reaches a percentage of 98%. This study aims to evaluate the accuracy and precision of the Hematology Analyzer Mindray BC-5380 in Predilute mode for measuring haemoglobin levels using capillary blood at RSU Fastabiq Sehat PKU Muhammadiyah Pati. The methodology used in this study was descriptive quantitative with a cross-sectional approach. Data was obtained through measurement of haemoglobin using the device, which was then analysed to assess accuracy and precision. The results showed a bias value of 2.58%, indicating good accuracy. The coefficient of variation (CV) value of 5.52% exceeded the limit set by the manufacturer, indicating poor precision. Further evaluation using the Levey-Jenning graph and Westgard's rule indicated a 12s deviation on the fifth day, indicating the possibility of systematic or random errors. The Mindray BC-5380 predilute mode haematology analyser had good accuracy of haemoglobin levels in capillary blood, but poor precision compared to the manufacturer's values.

PDF

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. A'isy, D. R., Hadi, W. S., Shafriani, N. R., Hasil, A., Kualitas, K., Hemoglobin, P., Grafik, M., & Westgard, A. (2024). Analisis kontrol kualitas hemoglobin hematologi analyzer puskesmas x menurut grafik levey-jennings dan six sigma. 2(September), 1457–1465.
  2. Andreswari, D., Ernawati, & Azizih, B. S. (2017). Implementasi case based reasoning untuk diagnosa penyakit berdasarkan gejala klinis dan hasil pemeriksaan hematologi dengan probabilitas bayes. In Rekursif (Vol. 5, Issue 1, pp. 43–54).
  3. Arini, F. Y., Handayati, A., Astuti, S. S. E., & Anggraini, A. D. (2023). Uji Komparasi Hasil Pemeriksaan Hemoglobin Menggunakan Hematology Analyzer dan Hemoglobin Meter pada Pasien Kadar Normal dan Abnormal Rendah. Jurnal Penelitian Kesehatan "Suara Forikes" (Journal of Health Research" Forikes Voice"), 14(1), 235–238.
  4. Arni, D. S. (2022). Perbedaan Jumlah Trombosit Sampel Darah Vena dan Kapiler Menggunakan Micro Pipette Hematology Analyzer. Repository Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang, 7, 6–18.
  5. Daves, M., Roccaforte, V., Lombardi, F., Panella, R., Pastori, S., Spreafico, M., Jani, E., & Piccin, A. (2024). Modern hematology analyzers: beyond the simple blood cells count (with focus on the red blood cells). Journal of Laboratory and Precision Medicine, 9, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.21037/jlpm-23-32
  6. Doni Setiawan, D. S. (2021). Hasil Pemantapan Mutu Internal Pemeriksaan HbA1c. Jurnal Kesehatan STIKes Muhammadiyah Ciamis, 7(2), 44–50. https://doi.org/10.52221/jurkes.v7i2.94
  7. Hoffman, M. S. F., McKeage, J. W., Xu, J., Ruddy, B. P., Nielsen, P. M. F., & Taberner, A. J. (2023). Minimally invasive capillary blood sampling methods. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 20(1), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/17434440.2023.2170783
  8. Irawan, M. P., & Helviola, H. (2022). Kadar Kolesterol Darah Tanpa Usapan Dan Dengan Usapan Kapas Kering Metode Point of Care Testing (Poct). SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, 2(1), 109–114. https://doi.org/10.55681/sentri.v2i1.308
  9. Kesuma, S., Syumarliyanty, M., & Hartono, A. R. (2021). Evaluasi Analitik Hematology Analyzer Diatron Abacus 3 Pada Parameter Hematologi Rutin Di Laboratorium Hematologi Poltekkes Kemenkes Kalimantan Timur. The Journal Of Muhammadiyah Medical Laboratory Technologist, 4(1), 1. https://doi.org/10.30651/jmlt.v4i1.6467
  10. Kumar, B. V., & Mohan, T. (2018). Sigma metrics as a tool for evaluating the performance of internal quality. Journal of Laboratory Physicians, 10(2), 194–199. https://doi.org/10.4103/JLP.JLP
  11. Kusmiati, M., Nurpalah, R., & Restaviani, R. (2022). Presisi Dan Akurasi Hasil Quality Control Pada Parameter Pemeriksaan Glukosa Darah Di Laboratorium Klinik Rumah Sakit X Kota Tasikmalaya. JoIMedLabS, 3(1), 27–37.
  12. Maharani, E. A., Erviani, R., Fajruni’mah, R., & Astuti, D. (2022). Penggunaan Six Sigma Sebagai Evaluasi Kontrol Kualitas Pada Hematology Analyzer Sysmex Xn-1000. Jurnal Riset Kesehatan Poltekkes Depkes Bandung, 14(2), 263–269. https://doi.org/10.34011/juriskesbdg.v14i2.2106
  13. Neufeld, L. M., Larson, L. M., Kurpad, A., Mburu, S., Martorell, R., & Brown, K. H. (2019). Hemoglobin concentration and anemia diagnosis in venous and capillary blood: biological basis and policy implications. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1450(1), 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.14139
  14. Nirwani, Hartati, T., & Faruq, Z. H. (2018). Analisis Akurasi dan Presisi Alat Hematologi Analyzer ABX PENTRA XL 80 di Laboratorium Rumah Sakit Roemani Muhammadiyah Semarang. Manuscript Universitas Muhammadiyah Semarang, 1–9.
  15. Pramita, L. L., & Wibawa, A. P. (2022). Perkembangan Teknologi Kesehatan di Era Society 5.0. Jurnal Inovasi Teknik Dan Edukasi Teknologi, 2(7), 307–313. https://doi.org/10.17977/um068v1i72022p307-313
  16. Puspita, D., Latudi, A., Amalia, A. A., Aulia, I., & Mu, U. (2024). Analisis Quality-Control HDL, LDL Dan Trigliserida Menggunakan Grafik Levey-Jennings Dan Six Sigma. Jurnal Kesehatan Tambusai, 5(3), 7887–7894.
  17. Rosalina, L., Oktarina, R., Rahmiati, & Saputra, I. (2023). Buku Ajar Statistika (pp. 1–132). CV. Muharika Rumah Ilmiah.
  18. Syahraini, Kesuma, S., & Irianti Rukmana, D. (2023). Gambaran Quality Control Alat Kimia Analyzer Rayto Chemray 120 Parameter Kreatinin Di Klinik Media Farma Samarinda. Mahakam Medical Laboratory Technology Journal, 3(1), 1–12.
  19. World Health Organization. (2010). WHO guidelines on drawing blood : best practices in phlebotomy. World Health Organization, 1–105.
  20. Yudita, F., Purbayanti, D., Ramdhani, F. H., & Jaya, E. (2023). Evaluasi Kontrol Kualitas Pemeriksaan Glukosa Darah di Laboratorium X Palangka Raya. Borneo Journal of Medical Laboratory Technology, 5(2), 358–365. https://doi.org/10.33084/bjmlt.v5i2.5184